No jab, No job?

A lot more than 30 % of large UK firms have got signalled that staff could be asked for proof vaccination before they are able to physically go back to work. Karen Holden, CEO of A City LAWYER looks at the legalities that could occur

Medical studies have began now to suggest getting fully vaccinated helps it be less likely it is possible to transmit the herpes virus or should you choose it’s a lesser level. Therefore many employees might feel safer when their colleagues have already been vaccinated. However, so how exactly does any employer juggle those anxious or unhappy to possess it, as it isn’t lawful to create having a vaccine mandatory presently. However, if the employee doesn’t have a condition or isn’t refusing on grounds of a safeguarded characteristic such as for example religion then can employers need them to really have the vaccine for safe practices purposes – thus staying away from a claim?

That is possibly an excellent argument supplying the employer could be confident there is absolutely no potential grounds for a discrimination claim just how far do they need to go?


Mandatory vaccinations are increasingly being produced lawful in November 2021 for healthcare professionals, however, not everyone. Therefore if employers elect to request/demand this, they’ll have to scrutinise the employment regulations carefully, along with plans, staff policies and contractual terms meticulously.

The thought of vaccinations becoming mandatory will be contentious and unprecedent. To the pandemic prior, most employment solicitors could have suggested against employers applying mandatory vaccination policies. Particularly according of policies retrospectively released, as without consent this might be considered a unilateral variation of contract which ultimately may lead to a claim for unfair dismissal or breach of contract (at the mercy of eligibility). So, will the government’s change to regulations provide employers the legal backing to get this done or are employers still left with guidance which could bring about them dictating policies which can be challenged by its staff?

It is a complicated and difficult time for employers that are duty bound to provide a safe functioning environment while having concurrent obligations never to discriminate against or breach its staff contracts. Furthermore, employers are usually tasked with attempting to juggle operations with staff isolating, some requiring flexible working, some along with genuine health vaccine or even concerns worries. This can make amending their policies and processes extremely difficult whilst attempting to navigate weekly legal announcements and getting clear in regards to what will be mandatory by law, what’s guidance only or at the employer’s discretion.


The principal issue will be that forcing staff to really have the vaccine may lead to claims for discrimination beneath the Equality Act 2006. If the employer had been to introduce an insurance plan that contravenes among the protected characteristics old, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, maternity and pregnancy, race, belief or religion, sex or sexual orientation, the employee may be permitted bring a claim in the employment tribunal. Additionally, there are major concerns about whether a worker would be permitted bring an injury claim, when they obtained the vaccine to retain their job, also it triggered a medical issue, like a serious injury or allergic attack, or when a mother will be pregnant, resulted in the loss of a child. In either circumstance, would the employer be kept liable?

If such legislation were to end up being introduced, and a worker had been to object to mandatory vaccination under among the protected characteristics observed above, would they have to ground this objection in evidence? Would the employee be asked to sign a medical waiver, or disclose all medical ailments to the employer and would it not have to be signed off by way of a medical practitioner?


It really is worth noting that the manufacturers of the vaccine won’t face any civil liability for effects claims. Also, the national government possess additional the COVID vaccine with their vaccine damage payment scheme, which awards advantages to individuals who’ve suffered undesireable effects from various vaccines. Is this the true way the federal government will protect employers and employees?

Will this connect with only client dealing with employees or the ones that attend people’s homes? You will have lots of challenges dealing with the national government to create this all out, but employers would be the ones bearing the risks as of this brief instant, until such time as legislative changes are created. Employers shall have to update their policies and contracts by reviewing the guidelines extremely carefully, and consider training its HR staff to take care of these matters. They’ll should also consider their insurance coverage terms to ensure they’re suitably protected against any claims.


If the employer seeks consent, it could arrange vaccination appointments for employees, however they have to be careful they do not deal with individuals less favourably should they won’t consent to vaccine uptake state for example, if a worker is disabled because they are still opening themselves up to potential claim then.

The initial steps employers should consider would be to audit their employment contracts and staff policies; update and create new documents, if necessary, consistent with current government regulations. Make certain these are accessible to all or any staff and so are done in a genuine way that’s not discriminatory. Any concerns by staff should promptly be addressed sensitively and. The main element is transparency, clear training and rules with clear communication supplied by senior members of staff in order to avoid confusion or concern.